

Feb. 25, 2008
I am very interested in the snowboard industry, and one of my favorite companies is Etnies shoes. Etnies is also the parent company of Thirty Two, who makes snowboard boots. The press Release I chose from Etnies corporate website was a rundown of a snowboard event they had sponsored called “Goofy vs. Regular.” GVR is a competition of pro snowboarders with a team that rides “regular,” or left foot forward, competing with a team that rides “goofy,” or right foot forward. Snowboarders argue about which way is better to ride, but it all comes down to what feels more natural to the rider. The official press release can be found at, http://etniessnow.com/blog/2008/02/25/official-gvr-press-release.
The first Article I chose was found on Transworld Snowboarding Magazine’s website (http://transworldsnowboarding.com/article.jsp?ID=1000042750). Transworld is the largest and most successful snowboard publication out there. Their magazine empire covers virtually all of the main action sports. Transworld actually sponsored the “regular” team in the event. The “regular” team ended up taking home the victory in the competition. This made for some definite gloating on Transworlds part. The entire article was devoted to bragging about how the “regular footers” stomped their competition. They even went so far as to say that “regular” was definitely the better way to ride, which in snowboarding is like saying right handed people are better writers than left handed people. This type of gloating and support is expected on the part of a sponsor to a certain extent. At the same time, from a journalistic standpoint, Transworld showed little integrity. One positive thing was mentioned about a “goofy” team rider throughout the entire article. Transworld showed their vested interest in a big way, and overall the article painted a negative view of their competition, not necessarily a positive view of their team.
The second article I found off of the same press release was found on the Snowboarder Magazine website (http://snowboardermag.com/features/news/gvr-goofy-regular-etnies/).
Snowboarder is the second largest snowboard publication and is in direct competition with Transworld. The difference I found in Snowboarders account of the event was very factual and contained more information from the actual press release itself. Snowboarder focused more on actually reporting the event. The article went over the event course in detail and gave praise to all involved in the event. This article was written very journalistically and is very balanced. It’s interesting to see how a publication with no financial interest in the subject can do a much better job of reporting than one which has a profit to make from the event reported. Overall this article was very positive and easy to read.
These two magazines were very obviously a target audience of the press release. Etnies had Transworld promoting the event all along with all sorts of features and hype leading up to the event. This type of promotion came free to them since Transworld was also a sponsor of the event. Snowboarder however, reported on the event because they knew it would be of interest to their readers, which made for better reporting. Etnies understood that Snowboarder would want to report their event, because of all the hype that Transworld had created in the minds of snowboarders. Etnies press release was effective, not because it was an outstanding press release, but because the event was worth reporting on. Even snowboard magazines don’t want to be left behind on a story.
I am very interested in the snowboard industry, and one of my favorite companies is Etnies shoes. Etnies is also the parent company of Thirty Two, who makes snowboard boots. The press Release I chose from Etnies corporate website was a rundown of a snowboard event they had sponsored called “Goofy vs. Regular.” GVR is a competition of pro snowboarders with a team that rides “regular,” or left foot forward, competing with a team that rides “goofy,” or right foot forward. Snowboarders argue about which way is better to ride, but it all comes down to what feels more natural to the rider. The official press release can be found at, http://etniessnow.com/blog/2008/02/25/official-gvr-press-release.
The first Article I chose was found on Transworld Snowboarding Magazine’s website (http://transworldsnowboarding.com/article.jsp?ID=1000042750). Transworld is the largest and most successful snowboard publication out there. Their magazine empire covers virtually all of the main action sports. Transworld actually sponsored the “regular” team in the event. The “regular” team ended up taking home the victory in the competition. This made for some definite gloating on Transworlds part. The entire article was devoted to bragging about how the “regular footers” stomped their competition. They even went so far as to say that “regular” was definitely the better way to ride, which in snowboarding is like saying right handed people are better writers than left handed people. This type of gloating and support is expected on the part of a sponsor to a certain extent. At the same time, from a journalistic standpoint, Transworld showed little integrity. One positive thing was mentioned about a “goofy” team rider throughout the entire article. Transworld showed their vested interest in a big way, and overall the article painted a negative view of their competition, not necessarily a positive view of their team.
The second article I found off of the same press release was found on the Snowboarder Magazine website (http://snowboardermag.com/features/news/gvr-goofy-regular-etnies/).
Snowboarder is the second largest snowboard publication and is in direct competition with Transworld. The difference I found in Snowboarders account of the event was very factual and contained more information from the actual press release itself. Snowboarder focused more on actually reporting the event. The article went over the event course in detail and gave praise to all involved in the event. This article was written very journalistically and is very balanced. It’s interesting to see how a publication with no financial interest in the subject can do a much better job of reporting than one which has a profit to make from the event reported. Overall this article was very positive and easy to read.
These two magazines were very obviously a target audience of the press release. Etnies had Transworld promoting the event all along with all sorts of features and hype leading up to the event. This type of promotion came free to them since Transworld was also a sponsor of the event. Snowboarder however, reported on the event because they knew it would be of interest to their readers, which made for better reporting. Etnies understood that Snowboarder would want to report their event, because of all the hype that Transworld had created in the minds of snowboarders. Etnies press release was effective, not because it was an outstanding press release, but because the event was worth reporting on. Even snowboard magazines don’t want to be left behind on a story.
